•
Wetlands concern:
Board postpones non-binding vote until town engineer can discuss site
By
SCOTT DOLAN
Union Leader Correspondent
GOFFSTOWN --- The
planning board on Thursday, August 11, 2005, postponed its vote on whether
to endorse the school district's proposed site for a kindergarten after
hearing concerns about wetlands on the site.
The vote on the site for the town's first public
kindergarten is non-binding.
Engineers for the school district, from True
Engineering, outlined plans for the site - showing a study of where the
proposed 16,000-square-foot building would go on a 26-acre parcel of
town-owned land on Elm Street and then where an elementary school could be
added in 2011.
The discussion shifted quickly to wetland concerns
raised by members of the audience, and ultimately led the board to request
more information and a study by the town engineer before addressing the
proposed site again on Sept. 15.
Voters in
March 2004 approved funding public kindergarten and this March approved
transferring ownership of town-owned land across Elm Street from Glen Lake
beach to the school district.
The
planning board voted last month to recommend sub-dividing the land to give
the school district nearly 26 acres, and the board of selectmen is slated
to decide next Monday (August 15) on whether to sign over a deed.
|
The school board does not need further approval from the planning board,
since planners have no authority over what the school board can do on land
it owns, Planning Board Chairman Richard Georgantas said.
"I'm
sure it will be reviewed, but we have no enforcement rights of this
process," Georgantus said. "(School officials) do have to follow
the state rules. They may not have to follow ours."
Georgantus
said any further vote the board takes would consist only of
recommendations to the school district.
Superintendent of Schools Darrell Lockwood said the school district
meanwhile has requested permits from the state to build and is waiting to
hear back.
Collis
Adams, a certified wetlands scientist who works for the state, was among
the most vocal members of the audience.
Adams
pointed out a flaw in the plan as designed now, indicating where it does
not meet the wetlands buffers required by the state.
Adams is
also chairman of the town's conservation commission and regularly sits as
a voting member of the planning board, but recused himself this time
because his home abuts the site. He also spoke as a representative
of the Goffstown Residents Association, a group opposed to the school
district's plan for the Elm Street site.
Several
other residents spoke in opposition.
Catherine Gorman cited a report by the town's
conservation commission that called the site "inappropriate" for
construction of a school building.
|
"We need a kindergarten, and we're going to need an elementary
school, and unless this site is capable of handling both we're doing the
town a disservice," Gorman said. "I have yet to be
convinced, based on the conservation commission report, that this is an
adequate site."
Conservation commission member Kimberly Peace said she is not
anti-kindergarten, but questioned the environmental impact of the school
construction as planned.
"Almost all of the development and the road is going in the wetland
buffer," Peace said.
Other
residents also spoke in favor of the school district's plan.
Lissa
Winrow said the town has already approved paying for the construction
and the longer it takes to build, the more it will cost.
"We
need a kindergarten in this community whether it is a standalone or
not," Winrow said.
Jeffrey
Tate, vice chairman of the school board's appointed kindergarten
building committee, questioned why the town board needed to consider
state requirements before making its vote.
Lockwood
urged the planning board to move quickly, so the school district can
begin construction on schedule at the end of September.
"To
waste a month at this point may be problematic," Lockwood said.
Georgantus said the school district has not yet even received permits
from the state.
"I
think we would very much like to see a plan with the state requirements
on it," he said.
|